Obamacare rage is all the rage at the moment and since I
have been a supporter of healthcare reform I will chime in. It’s not elegant but I’ve organized this into
sections that reflect my thinking on the ACA.
Legitimate
Healthcare System Problems Unaddressed by The Critics
·
Millions of people like myself are shut-out of
health insurance outside of a large group, employment based plan.
·
Thousands of people are routinely dropped by
their health insurers when they get sick and/or reach a lifetime policy cap
·
Thousands of the ones who get sick and don’t get
dropped have their premiums increased to unaffordable rates because they are
costing insurers too much.
·
49 million people are completely uninsured. If acknowledging the basic immorality and
inhumanity of this is too much to ask, just focus on the fact that these
uninsured people are making YOUR healthcare costs higher via expensive
emergency room treatment. You’re already
subsidizing them, just in the least efficient way possible.
·
60%+ of all bankruptcies in the US are medical
bill related. The majority of those
bankruptcies are from people who HAVE health insurance.
·
The US spends twice the per capita average of
the OECD countries for results that are average.
The people who are so giddy about all of the negative
headlines are offering no solutions for these very real problems. Why?
Because they don’t actually care about improving healthcare access and
delivery, they only care about attacking a president who makes them crazy.
Media Hyperventilation
If the media would have devoted this level of
sensationalism and attention to the problems of the pre-ACA healthcare system
Americans would have demanded reform decades ago and we’d probably already be
on a single-payer style system like the rest of the civilized world. The pre-ACA world has thousands of people who
were suddenly dropped from their coverage, or told their favorite doctor is no
longer in-network, or who had their premiums skyrocket from one year to the
next, or who were just flat denied coverage altogether due to a pre-existing
condition; plenty of real-life cases
that the media could have highlighted.
If the pre-ACA and post-ACA healthcare systems were given
a fair trial in the public media I have no doubt that “Obamacare” would come
out the clear winner. Interestingly, the
media has given zero coverage to the people who have already benefited from the
ACA or who will be benefiting over the next couple of years. And many of the ACA victim stories have been
roundly debunked, two prominent ones involved major features in the WSJ and on
CBS news. We are often presented with an
incomplete story that turns out to be not as clear cut as the headline
sounds. The ACA has some very real
problems. The rollout has been terrible, and many of the criticisms are
legit. But the media presentation is
making it out like the new healthcare law is ushering in the apocalypse for what
was a healthcare utopia. And comparing
it to Bush’s response to hurricane Katrina?
Because having some website glitches while you are trying to give people
better access to healthcare is JUST LIKE leaving hundreds of thousands of
people stranded and helpless after a devastating natural disaster. Please.
Republican Paradox
Conservatives have claimed from day one that Obamacare
will be an unmitigated disaster. If they
truly believe this to be the case then they should view it as political gold. Allowing Obamacare to be fully implemented
and then fail miserably could do more to discredit democrats/liberalism than
Roger Ailes could ever dream of. But
they’ve tried 40+ times to repeal the law.
They’ve desperately attempted to sabotage and defund it at every step of
the way, anything to prevent it from getting off the ground. Why?
Because their true fear is that Obamacare will SUCCEED. And their true expectations are evident from
their actions. If you really believe
something will destroy your opponents, you sit back and enjoy the carnage. You don’t fight desperately to stop it from
happening. If Obamacare does succeed it
will be a devastating blow to the republican party. For a party already suffering from
considerable demographic and image problems this cannot be a pleasant prospect.
Incidentally, it’s
been hilarious to see conservative media and republican politicians all of the
sudden playing the role of consumer advocate.
What hypocrites. Where was this breathless
concern when insurance companies were cancelling policies, denying coverage,
and jacking up premiums prior to the ACA?
Rationale For
The Healthcare Law
Insurance is simply the pooling of risk. The larger the pool, the lower the cost per
individual in the pool. This is an
actuarial fact. The idea behind
Obamacare is to get more people into the risk pool, thereby lowering the
overall cost. It’s a sound concept.
Healthcare is not a “product” that a person can simply opt in or out
of. Everyone will use the healthcare
system. Therefore, everyone who can
afford to should pay into it. The main
problem with Obamacare is that it relies on a patchwork of private, for-profit
insurance companies to achieve this larger insurance pool. It was set up this way in order to be “market
based” and therefore more palatable to conservatives. A single, mandatory, all-inclusive insurance
pool (aka: single payer) would achieve the ACA’s objectives far more
effectively. It’s interesting that most
of the ACA’s problems being pounced on by the opposition stem directly from the
compromises in the law that were intended to placate them. (Them being the republicans who believe in
the magical fairy dust of the so called free-market.)
Democrats and
ACA Supporters Have A Tougher PR Job
One of the central tenets of conservative politics is
playing on people’s inherent fear of change. Whether it’s the government coming
to get you, or the Muslims, or immigrants stealing your job and money, or
“socialized medicine”, the conservative machine thrives on fear. This is effective because fear of change is
natural to the human condition. Even if
it’s changing from something terrible to something better, people are more
comfortable with the devil they know.
Democrats and ACA supporters have always faced an uphill battle selling
the idea that healthcare system can change for the better.
My Criticism Of
The ACA
On principle I hate the idea that government can require
an individual to purchase a product from a private corporation. But again, this strange and unfair sounding
requirement stems from the fact that the ACA is a compromise designed to
appease republicans who demand a “market based” approach. Once it became clear that not a single
republican would vote for healthcare reform and that democrats would be accused
of being socialist Nazis no matter what they did, they should have scrapped the
market-based compromised and crafted a more “socialistic” program. At the very least they should have included a
public-option that would have given individuals the ability to meet the
coverage requirement without having to deal with the for-profit health
insurance cartel. At the time the law
was being debated it was amusing to listen to the same people who say
government can’t do anything right also complain that a public-option would
have unfair advantage over our beloved private insurers.
My second complaint with the ACA is how the individual
mandate is structured. The penalty for
not buying insurance is too low. And the
enforceability of the penalty is too weak.
The viability of the ACA depends on younger, healthier individuals
entering the insurance pool. The
mechanism designed to get them there has no teeth. If the new entrants to the insurance pool
are mostly older, sicker people, then health insurance companies will have no
choice but to raise premiums. This would
be the true death-spiral for the healthcare law.
My Prediction
In one to two years time the benefits of the healthcare
law will be evident and hundreds of thousands will be enjoying the benefits:
grateful to be able to buy reasonably priced insurance even if they have a
pre-existing condition, not having to fear being dropped from their insurance
coverage when they need it most, and enjoying overall lower premiums due to an
expanded insurance pool. Not to mention
the satisfaction of knowing their country has finally moved closer to making
sure the basic human need of accessible healthcare is now a reality for most of
their fellow citizens. But I think this
is just a stepping stone. Within thirty
years the absurdity and inefficiency of our privatized healthcare system will
become so obvious and undeniable that no amount of right-wing fear mongering
will be able to stop the move to a single-payer system.
7 comments:
There is a really easy solution to cheap medical cover, make multinational corporations foot the bill, after all they are the ones who are poisoning everyone! Take the fluoride out of the water, which is an s6 and s7 poison. AGENDA 21 (sustainable development) is about the genocide of 90% of humanity, so if we can get the multinational corporations to cease their attack on humanity, via poisons added to the food and water, the populous won't get sick!
Wow!!
Here's a good plan
A few years ago I spent a week in hospital (minor gall problems), had x-rays, mri, brain scan, blood tests, medication, ambulance service; stay was like a good motel. No charge. This' the system you guys should go for. I know your government has looked at our system.
Tony
Hi Tony,
The problem is that most Americans have been taught to believe that the healthcare systems of other countries are nightmarish scenarios with doctor shortages, long waits, and panels of doctors that get to decide when to put old folks to death. (Sounds crazy, but it's true!)
The entrenched interests here have done an amazing job of getting people to accept our god awful status quo and fear anything that might change it.
I wish more of them could get exposure to people like you who have actual experience with other healthcare systems and have good things to say. I agree - we need to look into Australia's (and others) systems.
All that you wish yourself for the New Year Ben; you and yours.
Tony
Thank you and likewise Tony; wishing you a wonderful 2014.
Hello Ben, just to keep you up to date on the Aussie health care system... Our government tells us we are in too much debt (15-20% of GDP, which is one of the lowest debt ratios in the world). So, to help pay off the debt our visits to the doctor (our own private doctor or hospital visits) we have been asked to pay a $7 co-payment. It won't pass through parliament but even so you should have heard the outcry and rightly so. If you'd like to have a look at our local newspaper on line - http://www.news-mail.com.au/just-in/ we don't think a great deal of our politicians and we let them know.
All the best
Tony
Hi Tony -
Thanks for that info. It's honestly jaw dropping that people will make a fuss over a $7 co-pay. Maybe Australians are more politically engaged than Americans. There's a vocal minority that sticks to their preferred media outlets and parrots the talking points they get there but other than most people in the U.S. aren't engaged in our political process outside of griping about every thing under the sun. Probably where 90% of our problem stems from; ignorance and apathy. Anyway, always good to hear from you. I keep meaning to write on here more often.
Post a Comment